The FREE Social Fundraising Platform

PRO PUBLICA INC

ProPublica is an independent, non-profit newsroom that produces investigative journalism in the public interest. Our work focuses exclusively on truly important stories, stories with “moral force.” We expose abuses of power and betrayals of the public trust by government, business, and other institutions, using investigative journalism to spur reform through the sustained spotlighting of wrongdoing. There's never been a more urgent moment for independent and unbiased journalism in this country. With your help, we can dig deeper and publish more hard-hitting stories that change the lives of Americans struggling with housing inequities, exploitive loans, the influence of money in politics, and more.

 

From the very first days of America’s existence as a country, the Founders valued the essential role of a free press. It’s no coincidence that the First Amendment to our Constitution declares that Congress shall make no law “abridging freedom of speech, or of the press.’’ Those words were meant to make sure journalists were free to expose the foibles and flaws of the nation’s leaders.
 

ProPublica journalists aim to fulfill that mission, bringing to light previously unknown practices of government and other powerful interests and stirring change in a surprisingly wide range of arenas.
 

At this moment, the United States is bitterly divided over almost every imaginable issue, and cannot even seem to agree on the facts that frame our disagreements. In such a climate, the role of careful, documented journalism is more consequential than ever. As we have for the first nine years of ProPublica’s existence, with your help, we promise to reveal stories with “moral force’’ and to be open with readers about our sources and methods. The Founders would expect nothing less.



 

The most important test of ProPublica is whether our work is having impact. By this, we mean not audience size or prizes, but real world change. Examples of what we mean, and discussions of how we think about the subject of impact, can be found at http://www.propublica.org/about/impact/

 

  • Following ProPublica’s reporting that students at for-profit schools accredited by the Accrediting Council for Independent Colleges and Schools (ACICS) have the lowest graduation rates in the country, and their graduates struggle the most to repay their student loans, the Education Department announced that it would terminate the agency. This unprecedented move to strip the powers of one of the nation’s largest accreditors of for-profit schools came after 12 state attorneys general, a coalition of 23 student and consumer protection organizations, an Education Department advisory committee and report from Education Department staff – all citing ProPublica – recommended that the government de-authorize ACICS. Sen. Elizabeth Warren had also released a report recommending sanctions against ACICS for its failure to provide effective oversight.

 

  • When ProPublica reported that Facebook allowed advertisers to buy credit, housing and employment ads that exclude anyone with an “affinity” for African-American, Asian-American and Hispanic people from seeing them, it sparked a wave of criticism aimed at the social network. Four members of Congress wrote Facebook demanding that the company stop letting advertisers exclude viewers of housing ads by race – which violates federal law – and the federal agency that enforces the nation’s fair housing laws began talks with Facebook to address concerns about their advertising practices. Two weeks after our story ran, Facebook announced that it would stop letting advertisers exclude users by race in ads under the housing, credit and employment categories, in addition to building an automated system to better help them spot ads that discriminate illegally.

 

  • Our series of articles published with the New York Daily News, which detailed “nuisance abatement actions” – New York Police Department lawsuits that give police the power to get yearlong closures of homes and businesses, under claims they are being used for illegal purposes – has shown important results. Since the investigation was first published in February, the NYPD has amended the process that allows the department to lock residents out of their homes before they’ve had a chance to tell their side of the story in court, and the number of nuisance abatement actions filed by the NYPD has dropped significantly. Several city council members introduced a package of 13 bills that would reform the way the NYPD carries out nuisance abatement actions. The department has expressed support for some of these, including measures to remove marijuana possession as a charge that could lead to an action, to mandate lab reports to support drug allegations, and to limit exclusions of most people from homes to one year. In addition, one family that was wrongfully kicked out of their apartment, citing our reporting, filed a lawsuit seeking to have the law declared unconstitutional.

 

  • A ProPublica investigation, published in July with the New York Times Magazine, spotlighted how police departments across the country use roadside drug tests to secure guilty pleas and send tens of thousands of people to jail every year – despite widespread evidence that they routinely produce false positives. Our reporting prompted the district attorney’s office in Portland, Ore., to review its drug possession cases. The office discovered five cases where defendants had pled guilty – but subsequent lab tests came back negative for the presence of any controlled substances – and vacated those five wrongful convictions. Portland’s district attorney’s office also changed the way it secured guilty pleas in drug possession cases based on these tests: now such pleas will not stand unless the preliminary police roadside test undergoes a lab analysis to have its results double-checked. In Las Vegas, where the second story in our series was based, the Nevada Attorneys for Criminal Justice set up a committee looking for ways to challenge law enforcement’s methods for getting drug convictions.

 

  • ProPublica and NPR reporting spotlighted Oklahoma’s workers’ compensation system, which allowed companies to “opt out” of state workers’ comp and write their own plans for dealing with injured workers. In September the Oklahoma Supreme Court struck down the opt-out system as unconstitutional, echoing the same ruling in February from the Oklahoma Workers’ Compensation. The U.S. Department of Labor is further evaluating whether opt-out plans violate workers’ rights under federal law. Other state Supreme Court rulings this year have struck down business-driven workers’ comp laws featured in ProPublica and NPR’s investigation. The Florida Supreme Court struck down laws that placed strict caps on attorney fees and limited workers to two ears of temporary disability pay regardless of whether they were able to return to work. Two-year caps also passed in California, North Dakota, Oklahoma, West Virginia and Texas. In addition, in October the U.S. Labor Department released a report detailing how states are failing injured workers – an effort prompted by ten members of Congress who urged the U.S. labor secretary to devise an oversight plan for state workers’ comp programs, citing ProPublica’s reporting. The report lays the groundwork for new federal oversight, as Sen. Sherrod Brown announced he was drafting legislation to address its findings and hoped to advance it in the next Congress.
  • ProPublica, in partnership with the Texas Tribune, launched a multimedia project showing that Houston is at risk of a major disaster: a hurricane with the potential to devastate the region. In December, President Obama signed into law a bill to expedite a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers study that will determine how best to protect Houston from such a hurricane. Called the “Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation,” or WIIN, Act, the law emerged from a bill that U.S. Sen. John Cornyn filed in April – one month after ProPublica and the Texas Tribune published our joint report. 

 

  • A ProPublica investigation, published in July with the New York Times, found that a New Jersey agency was pushing burdensome student loans with stringent rules, aggressive collections and few reprieves – even for borrowers who have died. In December, Gov. Christie signed into law a new requirement, prompted by our reporting, that the state’s student loan agency forgive the debts of borrowers who die or become permanently disabled. Though not yet approved by the full legislature, the New Jersey Senate also passed bills requiring the agency to obtain a court order before garnishing wages, taking state tax refunds, or suspending professional licenses. Another bill would set a borrower’s monthly payment at a level that is considered affordable based on his or her income. In September, a New Jersey state commission unveiled a report urging the agency to offer better protections for borrowers, including recommendations to boost students’ understanding of the terms before they sign for loans and to offer a rehabilitation program that allows borrowers who default to improve their payment status after several months of consistent payments.

 

  • After our reporting revealed that New York City landlords who collect lucrative tax breaks in exchange for providing rent-stabilized housing failed to register up to 200,000 apartments for the program, Mayor Bill de Blasio announced a large-scale enforcement program targeting more than 3,000 rental buildings. Saying “enough is enough,” de Blasio stated that building owners who fail to comply with the law will lose their tax breaks. Officials from the city housing authority and finance department are also finalizing a memorandum of understanding that will overturn a previous policy of giving away the benefit without ensuring compliance. In addition, since ProPublica’s investigation on this issue, two City Council members introduced a bill that would require the city’s housing arm to audit 20 percent of buildings receiving the tax benefit, and mandate that violators return the money. State lawmakers introduced a bill that would institute much higher financial penalties for landlords who overcharge their tenants, and the city’s housing commissioner outlined a plan for hiring more staff and investing in technology to improve management of the program. Two Brooklyn elected officials have also asked the state’s Tenant Protection Unit to investigate rent overcharges at a building ProPublica highlighted. In one circumstance, after ProPublica reported on a court battle between residents of a Manhattan apartment complex and a developer, more than three dozen New York public officials – 12 state senators, 12 assembly members, 13 city council members and New York City’s public advocate – filed an amicus brief supporting the tenants. Citing ProPublica’s reporting, the brief claimed that the tenants’ leases should have been rent stabilized in exchange for the tax breaks their landlord received. Officials said they joined the case, in part, to demand stronger oversight of an array of rent-stabilization programs that could potentially affect hundreds of thousands of units across the city.

 

  • In 2014, ProPublica and the Washington Post investigated the business practices of USA Discounters, especially the company’s high-priced loans to active duty service personnel. In the wake of our coverage, the company went out of business. In September, USA Discounters also settled with 49 states and the District of Columbia (Colorado settled with the company separately) over a suit accusing the company of various abuses, including misleading customers about the quality and price of its merchandise, its loan contracts, as well as aggressive debt collection. The settlement deal required USA Discounters to pay $40 million in penalties and to wipe out debt for its past customers.  

 

  • A 2010 ProPublica investigation covered two Texas-based home mortgage companies, formerly known as Allied home Mortgage Capital Corp. and Allied Home Mortgage Corp, that issued improper and risky home loans that later defaulted. Borrowers said they’d been lied to by Allied employees, who in some cases had siphoned loan proceeds for personal gain. In December a federal jury ordered the companies and their chief executive to pay nearly $93 million for defrauding the government through these corrupt practices.

 

  • Following our 2014 reporting that Verizon and AT&T were attaching hidden tracking numbers to their subscribers’ Internet activity, even when users opted out, Verizon agreed to pay $1.35 million to settle charges from the Federal Communications Commission that the undeletable “zombie” cookies violated customers’ privacy. The company also signed a consent decree with the Federal Trade Commission after the government alleged that the company made false representations to consumers. In the settlement, Verizon agreed to modify its privacy policy and provide users an effective opt-out of tracking.

 

  • In a joint investigation with the Washington Post and German news outlets Handelsblatt and Bayerischer Rundfunk, ProPublica examined dividend-arbitrage transactions, a trade strategy that helps foreign investors avoid an estimated $1 billion a year in taxes on dividends paid by German companies. Following our report, prosecutors in Frankfurt, Germany’s financial capital, launched an investigation into the trades, and the German Parliament voted to end the tax-avoidance deals in the country. Germany’s top finance official also released a statement criticizing div-arb, and a Danish member of the European Parliament called on the EU’s European Commission to examine the transactions, which are draining Denmark and many of its neighbors of tens of millions of dollars in forgone tax revenues.

 

  • After a series of ProPublica articles identified dozens of cases of nursing home workers posting dehumanizing photos of elderly residents on social media sites, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services in August announced a plan to increase its oversight to prevent and punish such abuse. In a memo to state health departments, the federal agency called on them to ensure that all nursing homes have policies prohibiting staff from taking demeaning photographs of residents, to investigate such complaints, and report offending workers to state licensing agencies for possible discipline. Sen. Charles Grassley, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, asked the U.S. Justice Department for specific information on how aggressively it pursues such elder abuse in nursing homes, days after Sen. Tom Carper similarly asked government regulators at the Office for Civil Rights of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services what they’re doing to stop nursing home workers from the dehumanizing practice.

 

  • ProPublica and the Virginian-Pilot have been investigating whether Vietnam veterans’ exposure to Agent Orange has also led to health problems in their children and grandchildren. At a ProPublica-sponsored Washington, D.C., event in June, Veterans Affairs officials announced new efforts to address this issue, including the agency’s first nationwide survey of Vietnam veterans in more than three decades and requesting an outside panel of experts to continue its work studying multigenerational impacts of Agent Orange.

 

  • ProPublica’s investigation on risk assessments, algorithms used across the criminal justice system that generate a score predicting a defendant’s risk of committing a future crime, found troubling failure rates. Our analysis of the algorithm used in Florida, Wisconsin and other jurisdictions showed that it is biased against black defendants, wrongly labeling them as future criminals at twice the rate of white defendants. Citing our reporting, in July the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled that, while judges may consider risk assessment scores during sentencing, warnings must be attached to the scores to flag the tool’s limitations. The Obama White House also cited ProPublica’s article in a report on the impacts of artificial intelligence across various sectors of society.

 

  • After a 2014 ProPublica and NPR story on Missouri’s Heartland Regional Medical Center showed that the nonprofit hospital had for years sued low-income patients over their unpaid bills, Sen. Charles Grassley launched a Senate investigation which concluded in June. As a result of the scrutiny, the hospital overhauled its financial assistance policy and forgave the debts of thousands of former patients.  

 

  • Following our report on abuse and neglect at the Carlton Palms Educational Center, a residential facility for children and adults with developmental disabilities in Orlando, Florida officials stationed an investigator at the center and formed a special team to closely monitor staff and residents. Over time, the state will also relocate residents to new homes.

 

  • In 2015, ProPublica and AL.com investigated a harsh Alabama law that charges women who used drugs during pregnancy with “chemical endangerment,” a felony that carries a 10-year sentence even if the baby is born unharmed or if the drug is legal. In May, the Alabama House of Representatives passed a bill to exempt women who use medically prescribed drugs from the state’s law.

 

  • In October, ProPublica reported that Google quietly changed a major privacy policy. The company had previously promised to keep identifiable information about its users separate from the advertising network DoubleClick, a Google subsidiary. However, this year Google updated its policy to say that users’ web browsing activities “may be” combined with their personal information collected from Gmail and other login accounts. In response to our reporting, two advocacy groups filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) alleging that Google had deliberately deceived consumers and that the privacy policy change violated legally binding commitments that Google made to the FTC.

 

  • In the days leading to Election Day, reporters on ProPublica’s Electionland project saw several instances of false information about voting requirements spreading on social media. One example we reported came from clothing retailer Urban Outfitters, which tweeted an election guide to its 1 million Twitter followers full of false information, including a claim that voters need a "voter's registration card" and an ID. After our story, Urban Outfitters promptly deleted the tweet and updated its guide.

 

  • After ProPublica reported that doctors who took payments from pharmaceutical companies prescribed more expensive, brand-name medications than those who didn’t, two medical journals published studies that confirmed this link. JAMA Internal Medicine found significant evidence that doctors who received meals tied to specific drugs prescribed a higher proportion of those products than their peers, with the share of the drug prescriptions rising with the greater number of meals they received. A Harvard Medical School study found that Massachusetts physicians prescribed a higher proportion of brand-name drugs the more industry money they received. 

 

  • A 2011 ProPublica investigation, published with Columbia’s Stabile Center for Investigative Journalism and the Center for Public Integrity, found that, while student loan borrowers with severe disabilities are entitled to have federal student loans forgiven, the program for deciding whether they qualify is deeply dysfunctional and inefficient. Federal officials consequently changed the program’s regulations, and this April the Department of Education announced that it will offer to write off $7.7 billion of student debt owed by approximately 387,000 borrowers who have become disabled.

 

  • Following our 2014 report on abusive discipline techniques at the Judge Rotenberg Center, a Boston-area school for children with severe developmental disabilities, the Food and Drug Administration moved to ban the facility’s use of a controversial electric shock device. In a 124-page document proposing the ban, the FDA accused the Rotenberg Center of underreporting harmful effects of electric shocks and misleading families about alternative treatments.

 

  • After our story on a Habitat for Humanity New York project that pushed out several low-income families in the process of buying and renovating buildings in Brooklyn, New York City Council member Robert Cornegy asked the charity’s local affiliate to find housing for the families who were displaced. Habitat for Humanity’s New York chapter took responsibility, encouraging the families named in the article to contact them directly in order to “help them find solutions that meet their needs.”